Syllabus

There are things in the fight game that you cannot teach. And those are the things that captivate us about prizefighting in particular over other sports. There is something about personally besting someone in a way that uses spatial, physical, and violent intelligence as communication. It’s an expression of one’s response to the variables in our life that we can’t control into an arena.” ---  Esther Lin, “Focus UFC 207 Edition,” MMA Fighting, Source: Focus 207 Edition MMAFighting.com

9d83f119fd3996cfee3561027003f65a.jpg

 WEEK 1: Introduction to Prizefighting

·      Attendance/Ice Breaker

·      Course Overview

·      In-Class Free Writing

Readings/Multimedia for January 24th 

·      Introduction (pp 8-12) to Jeremy Schaap, Cinderella Man (also on BB)

·      Introduction (pp IX-XII) of Reading the Fights. 

·      30 for 30 Podcast. No Rules: The Birth of UFC (season 2) https://30for30podcasts.com

 

WEEK 2: The History of Human Combat

Photograph shows a marble sculpture of ancient Greek wrestlers from 510 B.C. is part of an exhibition at the National Archaeological Museum in Athens (credit NBC news)

Photograph shows a marble sculpture of ancient Greek wrestlers from 510 B.C. is part of an exhibition at the National Archaeological Museum in Athens (credit NBC news)

Readings for January 23rd

·      Homer, Iliad, Book 23, line 664

·      Gottschall, Jonathan. “The Riddle of the Duel.” The Professor in the Cage. Why Men Fight and Why We Like to Watch. Penguin, 2015. Print. (BB)

·      David Remnick, King of the World: Muhammad Ali and the Rise of an American Hero (Introduction, Part 1: 3—77)

 

Readings for January 27th

·      Talese, Gay. “The Loser,” Esquire. March 1964. Print. Found online at The Stacks on DeadSpin.com (link has YouTube videos of Patterson vs. Liston II)

·      Liebling, A.J. “Ahab and Nemesis,” The New Yorker. 8 October, 1955, Print. (BB)

·      Sanneh, Kelefa. “No One Knows Whether Ronda Rousey Still Wants to Fight.” The New Yorker. 30 December 2016, Online. (BB)

·      David Remnick, King of the World: Muhammad Ali and the Rise of an American Hero (Introduction, Part 1: 3—77)

 

WEEK 3:

The Storyline (Heroes, Villains, and Rivalries) and Forwarding and Countering (aka the Punch and Counter-Punch of Argumentative Writing)

Muhammad Ali knocked out Sonny Liston in their second fight on May 1965 in Lewiston, Maine. (credit:  slate.com )

Muhammad Ali knocked out Sonny Liston in their second fight on May 1965 in Lewiston, Maine. (credit: slate.com)

 

Monday, February 4th:

We will evaluate the film Rocky and The Fighter, deconstructing their structures (plotlines, montages, mise-en-scene) and possible cultural ideologies (the American Dream, meritocracy, false consciousness, gender, etc.) Both of these film merge multiple narratives (rags-to-riches, the quest, rebirth, or overcoming the monster) to create emotionally charge films on boxing.

 

Assign Response Essay # 1 (due March 1st)

As a sports reporter, write about a fictional fight in either boxing or MMA. Your fighters may be from any background, and the fight can take place in the past, present or even future. The essay should be between 4-5 pages and is worth up to 25 points.

Monday, February 4th: Assign Paper

Thursday, February 7th: Pre-writing Exercise

Monday, February 18th: Peer workshops; Critiques Due

Thursday, February 21st and Friday, February 22nd: Class Canceled for Student Conferences (1:00pm-6:00pm)

Friday, March 1st: Final Draft Due!

 

Assignments and Readings for Thursday, February 7th:

·      Pre-writing (Some ideas to get you started)

This exercise can be found on the assignment sheet for Response Essay #1 that I handed out in class (also on BB).

Start brainstorming your paper. You can answer the questions in paragraphs or bullet points. I recommend at least one page of notes and please remember to bring this class. We will be doing a brief exercise.

 

·      King of the World: Muhammad Ali and the Rise of an American Hero (Introduction, Part 2: 81—153).

 

·      Recommended: Documentary, Biography Channel via Youtube, Muhammad Ali - He Changed Boxing as much as He Changed the World. 

Check this out if you get a chance. It’s one thing to read about Ali. It’s another to see him speak and fight.

 

WEEK 4: Fightwriters—

How Words Helped Build Champions.

 

We will use the beginning of class to share our fighters. Students will be asked to deliver an “elevator pitch” and listen to feedback from their peers.

We will then discuss King of the World (Part 1 & 2), using this text to begin our discussion of Forwarding and Countering in academic discussions.

We will discuss the following articles written about Muhammad Ali vs. Sonny Liston I, which took place in Miami Beach in 1964. These articles were written for specific audiences and comprised different styles, tones and voices. Please finish and turn in the discussion handout on Monday, February 11th

 

·    Le Roi Jone, "In the Ring," The Nation (June 29, 1964)

·     Tom Wolfe, "The Marvelous Mouth," Esquire (October 1963)

·     Murray Kempton, "The Champ and The Chump: The Meaning of Liston Clay I," The New Republic (March 7, 1964)

·      George Plimpton, "Miami Notebook: Cassius Clay and Malcolm X," Harper's (June 1964)

 

 

·      Videos for Monday:

 

  • Tyron Woodley: Race a factor in status as 'worst-treated' UFC champ, ESPN.com

 

·      Discussion Board on BB:

  • I will start two conversations that deal with Thrilla in Manilla and Tyron Woodley’s statements about race and MMA. Please add at least 3 comments to these threads and FORWARD and/or COUNTER with evidence to back up your claims.

 

  • I will start the Discussion threads on BB on Thursday, February 7. Please post by Sunday, February 10 at noon. Please email me if you have any trouble using this portal on BB.

·      Reading: Finish King of the World

WEEK 5   Race and Ethnicity— The Great White Hope and “Race Baiting”

 

Discussion on Blackboard:

Please extend the discussion on this fight, considering one of these questions:

 

·      Why did Philippine President Marcos want this Heavyweight Title Fight and its international attention in his country?

 

·      Why did Ali verbally abuse Frazier and characterize him in this way and was this behavior successful?

 

·      In this 2008 documentary, Joe Frazier is interviewed in his hometown of Philadelphia. We also watched the first film in the Rocky series. How do the storylines of these fighters compare? How do they differ?

 

·      In his afterward, David Remnick provides his overall analysis of Ali’s influence and believes that, despite losing some fights, Ali will always be considered The Greatest. Do you agree? How did Ali make such impact both inside the ring and in our culture?

 

·      Why does Tyron Woodley believe that race may be a factor in the treatment of UFC champions? What is it about the “fight game” that brings the topic of race to the forefront?

 

For Monday, February 18:

  • A True Champion Vs. The 'Great White Hope’ on NPR.com

 

  • How Bruce Lee Exploded a Stereotype With a One-Inch Punch, New York Times

 

 

WEEK 6 The King of the World: Geopolitical Implications of Boxing and MMA

 

We will spend the beginning of our class reflecting on what was frustrating and satisfying about the process. Perhaps there is a behavior or habit that is not working (i.e. text message interruptions) or another that you can adopt (i.e. breaking the assignment down into sections)? I suggest try something out for your next paper.

 

Class Discussion:

Today we discussed Jack Johnson, Jake LaMotta, and Bruce Lee, focusing on how these individuals defined and/or defied social archetypes. We will finish these discussions on Thursday.

 

Thursday:

Readings and Multimedia exploring Gender and Fighting

•       The Sociology of MMA: Women’s Integration into the UFC, Sociologyinfocus.com 

•       Why Do Female Action Heroes Always Do This? Black Widow, Mystique, and the “between-my-legs takedown.” Slate.com 

•       Assignment: Archetype

 One page– Write about a fighter we haven’t covered in class who defined or defied an archetype (can be real or fictional book, film, etc.)

  • Race

  • Ethnicity

  • Religion

  • Gender

  • Region

•       Use supportive evidence

 

WEEK 7 Point of View— The Challengers, The Audience, The Referee, The Promoters, Etc.

 

Mid-Term: March 7th

I will handout a study guide for our mid-term. Reminder: The mid-term is open book, but it is a good idea to review broad concepts and familiarize yourself with readings, films, multimedia, etc.

 

March 4th: Assign Response Paper # 2 (Due March 28th) Write an Op-Ed about an issue in boxing or MMA.

I handed out your next assignment (also on BB), which is due Thursday, March 28th. You will be writing an Op-Ed on topic relevant to combat sports. Op-Eds are articles that express the opinion of the writer as its main focus. Your job is to take an opinionated stand on this issue (claim), use techniques of persuasive writing (rhetoric) to sway your reader to agree with you, and back it up with facts (evidence.) 

For Thursday, March 7th:

 

To Get You Started On Your Op-Ed:

  • Write down at least three issues/conflicts that you are compelled by in fighting and write down some thoughts.

  • Bring in two sample op-eds that you find compelling.

March 7th- Class Debate: Is Fighting More Corrupt Than Other Sports? 

Hopefully, you now know which issue you would like to write about, have a possible counter-argument, and maybe even a rhetorical style for how you will write it.

Remember, if you are constructing a claim that is based on logos, bring statistics or examples to illustrate your logics. If you want to spark an emotional response (pathos), use vivid imagery or describe a story. Or, use ethos and include an expert opinion (even yours!) to compel your audience. In addition, don’t forget the power of the title with these essays. It should strike a cord and sway the reader to read your work.

 

Ideas to start your draft (due Thursday, March 23rd) Use a form!

•       Try using a rhetorical style from one of the opt-eds you picked out.

•       In addition, Graff and Birkenstein have templates for starting a debate that may also help you! https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CY7u-rZDyWRlmqMlA47B2ueHcMcVWR_-onF6nYPjnn8/edit.

*Mid-Term: March 7th*

I will handout a study guide for our mid-term. Reminder: The mid-term is open book, but it is a good idea to review broad concepts and familiarize yourself with readings, films, multimedia, etc.

 Spring Break (March 9-17)

March 18th, Class # 13

Don’t Bust your Brain: How To Read a Peer-Reviewed Paper.

 In academic publishing, the goal of peer review is to assess the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal. Before an article is deemed appropriate to be published in a peer-reviewed journal, it must undergo the following process:

•     The author of the article must submit it to the journal editor who forwards the article to experts in the field. Because the reviewers specialize in the same scholarly area as the author, they are considered the author’s peers (hence “peer review”).

•     These impartial reviewers are charged with carefully evaluating the quality of the submitted manuscript.

•     The peer reviewers check the manuscript for accuracy and assess the validity of the research methodology and procedures.

•     If appropriate, they suggest revisions. If they find the article lacking in scholarly validity and rigor, they reject it.

•    Because a peer-reviewed journal will not publish articles that fail to meet the standards established for a given discipline, peer-reviewed articles that are accepted for publication exemplify the best research practices in a field.

(source: Lloyd Sealy Library) 

 

We discussed how to identify a peer-reviewed (or scholarly) article, including:

  • academic and/or expert credentials of the journal and the author;

  • jargon for a specific audience

  • the use of citations and references

  • an abstract

In addition, we will discuss how to effectively read scholarly articles, which can be very challenging as they are written for a specific audience with jargon and presuppositions. We went over the SQ3R method (handout and video on BB), which challenges you to survey and skip around and come up with questions instead of trying to read straight through.

WEEK 10: The Lady is a Prizefighter— Gender and Sexuality in the Ring and the Cage

Evaluate the peer-reviewed article:

Female Fighters in MMA, Fight Like a Girl: A Look into Female Fighters from a Marketing Approach

Minyong Lee , Kalik Nesbitt, Alexander Brothers, & Tiffany Fuller

Department of Human Performance and Leisure Studies North Carolina A & T State University Greensboro, NC, USA

Evaluate the research of the above article. Who did the authors’ source, what is their research methodology, and what are their conclusions? Do you agree or disagree?

 

March 21st, Class # 14:

Assault in the Ring & The Smashing Machine

Billy Collins Jr. (left); Mark Kerr (right)

Billy Collins Jr. (left); Mark Kerr (right)

Violence and Society: Dangers of Combat Sports

Class Discussion on various topics, including Corruption, Cheating, Performance Enhancing Drugs, etc.

March 25th, Class # 15:

The Fighter is the Writer: The Art of the Personal Essay

Screen Shot 2019-03-25 at 7.50.55 AM.png

Clockwise from top left: Michael Bentt (Boxing), Tiffany Van Soest (Muay Thai & Kickboxing) Julie Kenzie (MMA), Ian Heinisch (MMA).

We will deconstructed rhetorical maneuvers that enable narratives to resonate in both tone and emotion. In particular, we discussed Phillip Lopate’s theory of double perspective, which acknowledges that there are two narrators interacting in personal essays. The “reflective narrator” allows the reader to vicariously live through the experience while the “retrospective narrator” conveys the wisdom of the current self.

March 28th, Class # 28

Guest Speaker Jamie Rebner

Screen+Shot+2019-03-06+at+9.04.52+AM.jpg

Jamie Rebner is a journalist with The Fight City and a Mental Performance Consultant with his company Bulletproof Mind Consulting.

Discussion on the Nigel Benn vs. Gerald McClellan fight and its tragic outcome.

Material for Discussion:

Fight of Their Lives (YouTube)

When The Cheering Stops

Aug. 7, 2004: Corrales vs Freitas

Bradley vs. Holt

Response Essay 2 Due (Thursday, March 28th at Midnight)

Assign Writing Project # 3: Research Project – Going the Distance: Focusing An Argument About Combat Sports and Society. Final Draft Due Tuesday, April 30th

 

April 1st, Class # 17

Guest Speaker Kevin Scanlon

CSCS Strength & Conditioning Specialist

Topic: Exploring Fight Camps, Strength & Conditioning Programs

IMG_5318.JPG
“The vast majority of a fighter’s career unfolds in the gym, not the ring or the cage….To find a compelling narrative and uncover the real story, we must dig into training camps and specifically the strength and conditional workout to find out what kind of fighter we are dealing with.”                          Kevin Scanlon, CSCS Strength and Conditioning Specialist     “The fight is the easy part. The training and the lifestyle is the hard part.”                          Michael Bisping, Believe You Me Podcast (43:18 of Episode 006 “Manipulate the Towel.”

“The vast majority of a fighter’s career unfolds in the gym, not the ring or the cage….To find a compelling narrative and uncover the real story, we must dig into training camps and specifically the strength and conditional workout to find out what kind of fighter we are dealing with.”

Kevin Scanlon, CSCS Strength and Conditioning Specialist

“The fight is the easy part. The training and the lifestyle is the hard part.”

Michael Bisping, Believe You Me Podcast (43:18 of Episode 006 “Manipulate the Towel.”

Class # 18, April 4th

Guest Speaker Charles DiGisco

Promotion, Capitalism, and The Fight Game

Screen Shot 2019-03-06 at 7.54.46 AM.png

 Guest Speaker Charles DiGisco

Charles DiGisco is a Color Commentator, Co-Owner of District Martial Arts, Podcast host of “The Lover & The Fighter,” and consultant at Lynch Consultants. He will discuss his experience with all aspects of the fight game, including the behind-the-scenes of fight promotions.

 

WEEK 12: Is Martial Arts An Art? Cultural Significance vs. Human Cockfighting

Reading:

·      “Meryl Streep slammed mixed martial arts. She doesn’t know what she’s missing.” Sunny Bunch, Washington Post.com 

·      “Say No to Fight Club, New York,” Nicole Gelinas, New York Times. 

 

WEEK 13: Cinderella Man— The Narratives of the Underdog and the Comeback

 

       April 15th: Film Discussion Group Activity

          

Film Discussion Group Activity: Like writing, fighting and films have a unique partnership.

Writer DJ Summers explains, In over 150 boxing films made from the medium's beginning, the boxer guides us through society's ugly bits, from the Depression's debased poverty to man's instinct for cruelty and need for redemption. (guardian.com)

In order to explore six films outside of our required list, the class will break up groups to watch a film and then briefly present it to class. A 10-minute discussion will include:

1)    The fighter(s);

2)    The place and its importance to the characters;

3)    The narrative arc (i.e. coming of age, the comeback, rivalry, etc.);

4)    The cultural context (i.e. economic instability, political or corporate corruption, gender, geopolitical impact, etc.).

The list of six films we may explore include:

1)    The Prizefighter and the Lady (1933);

2)    The Harder They Fall (1954);

3)    Champion (1949);

4)    Someone Up There Likes Me (1956);

5)    Fight Club (1999);

6)    Southpaw (2015);

(10 points total)

Week 14: Fighting Out Of— From Stockton to Lowell, Place and Location as a Character

 

Week 15  April 24th and 27th: It’s All Over? Can a Fighter Ever Win the Fight Game?

 

Week 16  May 1st:  The Future of Combat Sports/Class Review

 

Week 17 Final Presentations and "It's All Over!"

101.42    Final Presentation: May 2, 2019       11:20am-1:50pm

101.66    Final Presentation: May 6, 2019       2:30pm-5:00pm